Dershowitz: Zimmerman Affidavit ‘Irresponsible And Unethical’

by Dan Linehan on April 13, 2012

in Society

Alan Dershowitz

Harvard University law professor Alan Dershowitz made an appearance on on MSNBC’s Hardball to discuss the Zimmerman arrest affidavit, and had some incredibly harsh language for Angela Corey concerning her actions in the George Zimmerman prosecution.

Dershowitz is a well-known Democrat with a column on the Huffington Post, but seemed stunned by how poorly written the affidavit was, going so far as to call it “irresponsible and unethical,” as well as Corey’s actions politically motivated. He also said that if the prosecution didn’t have more evidence for the case than what we’ve seen, “a good judge would throw it out.”

Here’s the interview:

Smerconish: Joining me now, Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz. Professor, I’ve really looked forward to this conversation. You’ve seen the affidavit of probable cause, what do you make of it?

Dershowitz: It won’t suffice. Most affidavits of probable cause are very thin; this is so thin that it won’t make it past a judge on a second degree murder charge. There’s simply nothing in there that would justify second degree murder. The elements of the crime aren’t established.

Basically what’s in the affidavit is what’s in the public domain, with the exception of a few little things that were put forward by your previous commentator. But the fact that the mother identified the voice as that of her son, of course, we all knew that was going to happen. There’s nothing in there of course either about the stains on the back of Zimmerman’s shirt, the blood on the back of his head, the bloody nose, all of that.

It’s not only thin, it’s irresponsible. I think that what you have here is an elected public official who made a campaign speech last night for reelection when she gave her presentation, and over-charged, way over-charged. This case will not, if the evidence is no stronger that what appears in the probable-cause affidavit, this case will result in an acquittal.

Very strongly worded statements from Dershowitz, who basically stopped just short of directly claiming Corey engaged in prosecutorial misconduct by her actions.

See more crime scene maps here..

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Black Racism 152 pts

Crump, Charlatan, Jesse Just me jackson know a lot about unethical (and all are very good at irresponsible).....

.

tiem to arrest the martins fultons for their sigificant negligence and their many lies.

.

time to take away angela nifong corey's law license

patti is ticked 7904 pts

Looks like Lester will rule on whether or not he plans to recuse himself by the end of this week. That, IMO, would be the only prudent thing to do; as his bias has been quite clearly established via his conduct toward the Defendant.

AghastinFL 1874 pts

I had to post the hearing review in two parts this is entirely the work of cboldt at TalkLeft.... because of posting issues it is not properly ordered, it begins below after the morning five minute recess. 

 

AghastinFL 1874 pts

part 2 after recess:

 

Adam Vincent to the stand, Seminole County probation officer.

Thinking ahead a bit, I think O'Mara is establishing 1) that Zimmerman's financial condition doesn't support an increase or maybe not even a new bond, 2) that Zimmerman has a valid self defense claim (so the state's case doesn't meet Proof Evident), 3) that he's not violated a condition of bail (and ergo hasn't acted in a way that establishes flight risk) and will conclude just with a request for release on bail.

De la Rionda says that it's possible Zimmerman could have violated his bail conditions, drinking or weapons, and the probation officer would not know this, other than two times his premises were checked.  I keep forgetting, which side has the burden of production of evidence?

O'Mara moves to enter 911 call from W11 into evidence.  Delay as he and the state make sure the recording id properly redacted.  O'Mara has no other witnesses, but will move to enter another statement into evidence. 

~

The 911 call is being played, well, trying to get it to come out for the courtroom - at least the state and O'Mara agree it is properly redacted.

Screaming being heard in background of the call.  Caller doesn't want to go out to investigate.  Caller thinks the voice is calling for help.  Just heard one gunshot.  Caller orders somebody to "get in here now."  O'Mara will submit the entire call, but the part that is relevant for the bond hearing has already been played.

FDLE report document that Robert Zimmerman appeared at State Attorney office and identified the voice as Zimmerman.  De la Rionda objects, as hearsay.  Robert Zimmerman is called to the stand. 

~

George Zimmerman's father takes the stand.

O'Mara examines the witness.  Testifies he is George's father.  Had an opportunity to review a 911 call.  O'Mara is going to play it again (I think Sybrina and others from the Crump camp left the court the first time this was played).  The screams are coming out pretty clear - then the gunshot.  O'Mara asks "were you able to hear it?"  Yes.  Same tape you heard before?  Yes.   You filled out a statement?  No - gave oral statement.  How many times did you listen to it?  Once there, had heard it once before.  Who was with you?  An investigator, don't recall his name.  Could you ID the voice?  Yes.  Whose was it.  It was absolutely George's.

Cross exam.  You had listened to it before?  Yes.  Once.  You hadn't heard your son scream before had you?  Yes, many times.  You agree there are other voices?  Yes.  Do you hear more than one screaming for help?  No.  You are aware Zimmerman says his voice was muffled (no, he says he was being smothered).

Tough to cross examine, as whatever de la Rionda claims against Zimmerman's father, also goes against Sybrina.

O'Mara says he would like to have called Shellie, but her counsel objected.  He wants to put Zimmerman on the stand to address the court.  O'Mara argues for no cross exam.  Lester cites the wrong law for applying a no-bail condition.  Lester says the wrong isn't against Lester, it's against the Court.  If Zimmerman takes the stand, he'll be subjected to cross examination.  Lester will not be the person submitting questions.

O'Mara confers with co-counsel, Zimmerman is listening.  Zimmerman does not take the stand.  No more witnesses.  Legal arguments ... 

~

O'Mara argues that Zimmerman trusted investigators, and the state - then the prosecutor steps in and charges him with 2nd degree murder, would not agree to bond.  The state has not presented any evidence that the moving of money had any negative intent.

O'Mara admits that Zimmerman should have jumped up and said his wife was lying - Lester objects to that.  O'Mara points out that Zimmerman did offer up the information (27 April).  O'Mara says even if the error causes some distrust on the part of the court (maybe mutual distrust), you should look at Zimmerman's other actions as trust building.

Will he appear?  He has a history of submitting. Danger to the community? No evidence of that. Financial condition? You have testimony today. Strength of the state's case for 2nd degree murder? Now you have evidence. Zimmerman was minding his own business as well.  There is nothing in Zimmerman's statement

Lester says the only issue is the lie.  That all O'Mara is doing is a reverse Arthur.  O'Mara says he was responding to the Court's order that said the state's case was strong.  O'Mara says he is obliged to present evidence that 2nd degree murder is an improper charge, and the evidence presents a strong case of self defense.  O'Mara errs by referring to W9, should be W6 who said MMA style fight.

O'Mara is putting on a strong argument for self-defense, now based on evidence.  O'Mara says the state's case is weak, and does not merit high bond.

De la Rionda says the self-defense evidence can't be considered now, because Zimmerman did not take the stand and submit to cross examination.  De la Rionda says that Zimmerman was the aggressor (O'Mara will ask again, what is the evidence).  De la Rionda says we aren't here to try the case.  Martin's parents say the voice is Martin; Zimmerman's account is inconsistent; he can't be screaming with hand on mouth and nose.  W6 isn't sure who is on top.  One witness says there was a chase, which is Zimmerman chasing Martin.  Why is the 7-11 tape in evidence?  Does that mean Martin is a criminal?  Did the clerk perceive Martin as a threat because Martin was wearing a hoodie? (we don't know, but from the tape, the clerk kept an eye on Martin).  De la Rionda says Zimmerman is acting as the police, and at some point the victim does hit him.  Injuries are inconsistent with being bashed, there is no skull fracture, there is no concussion.

Back to April 20, and Zimmerman being deceitful.  Commends O'Mara for bring the finances to the court.  Requests no-bond.

O'Mara explains 7-11 picture brought in to show Zimmerman's size, not the hoodie.

No disclosure in discovery yet that Zimmerman challenged Martin in any way.  Asks to not punish Zimmerman any more than he's already been punished.

Recess. 

 

AghastinFL 1874 pts

The June 29th Bail hearing in review, H/T to cboldt at TalkLeft the review is entirely his work:

 

O'Mara introduces an affidavit of Zimmerman's financial situation.  Witness sworn in on financial matters, tracing of assets in search of missing funds.  Witness has been hired by O'Mara to perform review of records pertaining receipt of funds from PayPal, and accounting for the transfers of funds culminating in transfer of funds to trustee.

PayPal account was active for 11 days, is technically still active and has a current balance of $700.  Net $197,567.91.  PayPal rules $10,000 maximum transfer per transaction.  No funds unaccounted for, will discuss cash residual.  None of the $10,000 or less were cash transactions, so no violation of regulations pertaining to cash transfer reporting.

Cash $12,100 spent on household expenses, $13,000 still in Zimmerman accounts.  Records (receipts, statements) exit to legitimize the $12,100 expenditures.  April 25 check of about $125,000 to O'Mara.

De la Rionda cross examination, that Shellie and George were talking in code in order to hide their financial activity.  He also probes the financial condition on April 20.  The witness does not have records pertaining to Zimmerman's sister's account.  De la Rionda suggests that some funds are not accounted for, and held in residual out of sight.  $49,000 expended or put into cash - witness does not have the canceled checks to determine if transfers to sister were cash or checks.  De la Rionda asks why Shellie waited 4 days to move from George's account to hers; and why in < $10,000 amounts?  Delay maybe due to bank hold, amounts just happen to match PayPal amounts, but were not limited by bank rules or reporting regulations.  Seems to be practicing for the perjury case.

~

Repayment of debt was about $11,340.  Credit cards, personal loan of about $4,500.  Witness did not review how funds were applied to the bond.  Witness did not review what was put into safe deposit box.  Witness did not review jailhouse calls.  De la Rionda establishes that George would have had to provide e-mail and password to facilitate transfer.

Expenses were payments to WalMart, Target, dining out.  $250 to WAMU, in response to de la Rionda inquiry if any funds were used to pay college expense.  Witness knew amounts of cash, but did not know disbursement of cash.  On April 20, there was $130,000 under Zimmerman control.  O'Mara establishes that money-out / money-in amounts balance, so that the sister's account doesn't have any gain as a result of the transfers [but may have a gain from the cash].

O'Mara mocks the notion that spending on living was out of line, in light of the website saying it was seeking money for living expenses.  Dining out was for Chick Fila and similar.

Also paying car loans (O'Mara previously noted the cars are a net negative to Zimmerman).  As far as the witness knows, the only money coming in to Zimmerman is via public largess.  $24,000 for debt payment and living expenses.  De la Rionda is focused on payments to school.  Witness points out you don't hide money by transfers, only by cash.

O'Mara wants to move all of Zimmerman's statements into evidence.  O'Mara is going to play part of one of them for the court ... 

~

O'Mara played the part of the "re-enactment" where Zimmerman reviewed his injuries for investigators.

Photographic evidence of injuries also moved into evidence.  De la Rionda objects, I think, but Lester says "the Court has already seen them."

Kevin O'Rourke called to the stand (EMT, IIRC).  Not sure where O'Mara is going with entering injury evidence into the trial record.  I bet de le Rionda is slightly nervous at this point. 

~

...O'Mara might be laying groundwork for a motion to dismiss.  At the least, he is laying groundwork to ask if the state has any evidence to counter certain points.

But, the injuries, on their own, don't get anywhere.  I don't think the state will argue the injuries weren't "as documented."  O'Mara is going to have to get entered into evidence a contention for the source of the injuries; and then ask if the state has any evidence to the contrary. 

~

Not a life threating injury at the time, says the witness.  Witness will agree with [EMT] Brandy's statement that Zimmerman had minor bleeding.

De la Rionda asks about injury to Marin.  Gunshot to the chest, deceased on [EMT] arrival.  Witness did not see any weapon on Martin.

West asks the witness to describe "minor bleeding" as a term of art in the medical field. De la Rionda objects, overruled.  West notes that head injury can be life threating without showing external damage.

Can't diagnose concussion in the field.  No skull fracture ....

De la Rionda asks or states that the witness can't tell which person was the aggressor based on an injury.

IMO, this is a rabbit hole of an argument.  Fear of injury may or may not depend on sustaining an actual injury, and Zimmerman's fear in the last moments of the combat is driven primary from fear of being disarmed.

De la Rionda argues that Zimmerman went to the doctor because his workplace required a police report?  Huh?

O'Mara asks to admit the voice stress test.  De la Rionda objects.  Lester sustains the objection.  O'Mara says this is a bond hearing, not a trial, and the stress test is corroborative of the witness statements in evidence, and is being entered partly in response to the court's contention that the state's case is "strong."  I think the state won this one.

O'Mara points out statement of witness No. 6.  Now we're getting into the material that supports a motion for dismissal; at the very least, establishing that the state's evidence does not meet Proof Evident.  De la Rionda objects because he does not have an opportunity to cross examine, the evidence submitted is incomplete (does not have de la Rionda's interview) and because he does not want to disclose the witness ID at this point in time.  De la Rionda objects because the transcript evidence hasn't been authenticated.  O'Mara says he can play the audio, in lieu of an authenticated transcript.  W6 package comes into evidence. 

~

Camera pans.  Crump is in the courtroom.  Head is down.  Sybrina is there too.  I'm listening more than watching.  I don't see the camera view most of the time, just happened to open that screen on my computer at the moment the camera was on the audience.

W6, W11, W20 is the material being submitted into evidence.  The press asks what will be redacted.  O'Mara intends that witness ID remain redacted.  The press says if the court is receiving material with names unredacted, it changes the legal dynamic of public disclosure.

O'Mara enters the coroner's report into evidence; then holds off until O'Mara redacts victim address information.

7-11 video being entered into evidence.  No objection.

Five minute break at O'Mara's suggestion. 

~

carrollstraus1 11 pts

I agree this case is a mess-- and very political.

Paul Hue 3470 pts

 realitycheck Corey is a pimp.

Rowwdy 8669 pts

 Aussie54   Where did you go Aussie?   

patti is ticked 7904 pts

NY Daily News has another Dersh article-he says "Time To Drop George Zimmerman's Murder Charge. He goes on to say Angela Corey may not do that, as she hasn't behaved ethically so far.

Aussie54 3586 pts

 patti is ticked he is absolutely spot on regarding Angela Corey. She has not been in the slightest bit ethical in the way she has been handling things. 

 

She needs to be disbarred. 

patti is ticked 7904 pts

 Aussie54 She may need to be, but you know, as do I, that isn't about to happen. Sociopathic, self-serving people like that usually get away with whatever they do. Cold, hard, cynical reality. If only...

Paul Hue 3470 pts

Some "teens" gang-attacked some "concert goers" in Newark. We know it was not a group of honkey teens attacking black concertgoers, because of the very brief length of the article, its buried placement, and omission of any mention of race in the headline or body. However, the concert performance was by the Red Hot Chili Peppers. 

 

http://www.myfoxny.com/story/18242422/wave-of-violence-following-newark-concert

Paul Hue 3470 pts

Since these were teens, and they were unarmed, nobody would have been justified in drawing a sidearm and shooting any of the mass-attackers in the face, no?

patti is ticked 7904 pts

 Paul Hue Actually, they would have been totally justified, but most laws won't allow guns at concerts and sporting events in stadiums.

Redbrow 1289 pts

Trayvon Martin Shooting – Exploitation Tour Arrives In London

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/05/09/trayvon-martin-shooting-exploitation-tour-arrives-in-london/#more-39370

 

They had so much in common. For example both had dark skin and... well that's about it.

 

Look at them fancy threads. Where the hoodies at?

 

Aussie54 3586 pts

 Redbrow they have nothing in common because Stephen was attacked by a gang of thugs, and in the other case the thug is the one that died.

patti is ticked 7904 pts

Many here have questions as to what constitutes LAW concerning Florida and self-defense. Attorney Richard Hornsby has an explanation for you. And it is put in simple to understand language in his blog:

blog.richardhornsby.com/. Mr. Hornsby goes further to explain the language Corey used in her affadavit, why she worded it the way she did. Looks like it was done to INFLAME.

GWCarver 1809 pts

 patti is ticked 

That one get an A+ Patti.

patti is ticked 7904 pts

 GWCarver Except for one thing-noticed I made a typo-misspelling of "affidavit"...I put an A after the F...I know, BFD, but that sort of thing is what I hate to do.

uniteusnow 43 pts

Arizona Neo-Nazi Sheriff Candidate Killed Family, Self - ABC News abcnews.go.com › US4 hours ago – Police believe Ready killed four people during a domestic dispute before he turned the gun on himself. Ready was a prominent neo-Nazi and ...

 

....''Three generations were among the dead. Ready's live-in girlfriend of two years, Lisa Mederos, 47, was killed, along with her daughter Amber Mederos, 23, and granddaughter Lilly, 1.

The body of Amber Mederos' boyfriend, Jim Hiott, 24, a veteran who served in Afghanistan, was found outside of the house near where Ready is believed to have killed himself, police said."

 

http://abcnews.go.com/US/arizona-neo-nazi-sheriff-candidate-killed-family/story?id=16269803

 

Neo Nazi kills Mexican Girlfriend 

Terry Mann 1168 pts

 uniteusnow And this relates to this post how?

uniteusnow 43 pts

 Terry Mann 

Some people suggest because Zimmerman had a couple Black friends during his life, that there's no way he could  have racially profiled  Trayvon.   

Some ask how could Zimmerman hate Mexicans. He's HispanicThis Ready had a Mexican girlfriend, yet he was a mexican hating neo nazi. How could that be? 

Both Zimmerman and Ready shot and killed unarmed people. In Ready case even shot a 1 year old baby girl.  Ready was Republican precinct Captain. Zimmerman was a Neighborhood Watch Captain. Tough guys.  

uniteusnow 43 pts

 snapsbacula   Stupid and wrong. I understand arrest have been made. GOOD, 

 

What do you think about the Neo Nazi Republican precinct Captain JT Ready killing his Mexican girlfriend, 

BertDilbert 2211 pts

 uniteusnow  Terry Mann 

"Ready was Republican precinct Captain. Zimmerman was a Neighborhood Watch Captain. Tough guys."

 

President Obama is commander in chief.  He assinated Osama bin laden.

 

Tough guy.  Except he ordered the killing.  

 

Cowardly.  

dan123123123 2752 pts

 uniteusnow  Terry Mann Wow an army major killed a bunch of people too in the name of allah or whatever didn't he? What's the point? Zimmerman killed someone ASSAULTING him did this guy? No he was just a whacko it seems. I'm not going to read it...

Raylmt 1069 pts

 uniteusnow  Terry Mann

 lol black folks call eachother nigga..I guess they hate themselves too huh? If George was telling the truth about those particular people then whats racist about it?

FredrickMassey 47 pts

 uniteusnow  Terry Mann 

"Ready was Republican precinct Captain"

 

BUT RAN AS A DEMOCRAT?

FredrickMassey 47 pts

 uniteusnow  snapsbacula 

 

"What do you think about the Neo Nazi Republican precinct Captain JT Ready killing his Mexican girlfriend, "

 

lol

 

Ready was a nazi democrat.  Wait.  Isn't that the same thing?

Aussie54 3586 pts

 uniteusnow  Terry Mann there is absolutely no relevance in your suggestion. It is totally ludicrous. George Zimmerman is a black man!!

Aussie54 3586 pts

 uniteusnow  snapsbacula it has nothing at all to do with the GZ case.

This other case was due to a domestic dispute. People kill their partners all the time. In fact I can recall a case in Melbourne Australia where a bomb planted in the car killed a woman. (this was in the 1970s). It turns out that the man was a customer of my father, who was a small business TV serviceman and did work all around Melbourne. To our shock it was the husband who planted the bomb and killed his wife. 

 

At the moment, here in Australia there is a new case where a woman went missing, and of course the husband remains the suspect. The woman's body was found and a murder investigation is underway. I expect that the husband will be charged with her murder.  

 

I can remember another case where a pregnant woman disappeared not far from where I was living at the time. The husband did a great sob story and when the woman's body was found, it turned out that the husband had killed her. From memory, they were of Greek origin. 

 

Now get this one, in the 1960s my 20 year old cousin was abducted, raped and murdered. It was a murder-suicide. To cut a long story short, the murderer was the boarder in the house my cousin and husband were renting. The man wanted my cousin, and she refused. He made threats, and my cousin and husband went to the police, but they refused to intervene. The police considered it to be a domestic situation. This man threatened to kill my cousin's daughter but the police did nothing!!!!!!!!!! 

 

Then there is the case of the Chinese family that was murdered in Epping, NSW. It turned out the murderer was the uncle. Then there is the case of the Filipino family in Ryde NSW and it turned out to be the son who did the murders. I can cite many other cases as well. 

 

There is no comparison between the two situations where there had been a domestic dispute that led to the deaths of the family and the situation where Trayvon Martin jumped George Zimmerman and it was TM who ended up dead. 

Aussie54 3586 pts

 uniteusnow  snapsbacula Zimmerman is a registered Democrat. What is your point?

Paul Hue 3470 pts

 Raylmt  uniteusnow  Terry Mann It's racist to state the facts of black folks. This "racism" cover is the reason why the black average lags: covered problems cannot be solved.

Paul Hue 3470 pts

 uniteusnow  Terry Mann uniteusnow: Did these unarmed people that the Nazi shot attack him? Were they behaving in ways that caused him to suspect them of endangering the lives or properties of his neighbors? 

Paul Hue 3470 pts

 uniteusnow  Terry Mann uniteusnow: Well, the fact that the Nazi had a Mexican girlfriend certainly does undermine his status as a racist. So what is the evidence, again, that Zimmerman is a racist? We understand that back before anybody knew any facts of this case -- other than that Zimmerman was white and "self-appointed; that the Lead Investigator wanted to arrest him, but that the prosecutor meeting with Zimmerman's father blocked that; that Trayvon looked like a baby-faced 12 year old and "majored in cheerfulness -- that the Tawanna Duke Lynch Mob announced that Zimmerman was a racist. But aside from that announcement, based on what may we understand that Zimmerman believed that black people are inherently inferior, or should have fewer legal rights than whites? 

Paul Hue 3470 pts

 uniteusnow  snapsbacula uniteusnow: We supporters and fans of Zimmerman think that the Neo Nazi Republican who killed his girlfriend is an even bigger scumbag than Trayvon, and we wish that his girlfriend or a nearby neibhbor had been armed and had shot him prior to his murdering anyone. We sure hope that such a neighbor would not have waited for the cops to have arrived, and would have disregarded any dispatcher ordering him or her to make his or her own safety his or her primary concern. 

 

And we don't even care what racial category that his girlfriend qualifies for on her Harvard application or Firefighter test. Any more questions for us?

Aussie54 3586 pts

 uniteusnow  Terry Mann and some left wing goobers are so intent upon drawing the long bow that they have to find irrelevant cases in a pathetic attempt to make a point.

 

There is absolutely no comparison in the two situations because Trayvon Martin was the aggressor and he had his hand on the gun during the struggle for the gun. He had gunpowder on his forearms and on his hoodie. 

Aussie54 3586 pts

 uniteusnow  Terry Mann BTW Zimmerman is a black man according to all definitions of what constitutes a black person.

 

This is not a racist case no matter how you try to spin the situation. 

 

Trayvon Martin was up to no good when he was spotted by Zimmerman. Trayvon Martin actually menaced Zimmerman whilst Zimmerman was on the phone to the police. 

Trayvon Martin decided to run, not to go home but in order to set a trap for Zimmerman. 

 

Trayvon Martin hid himself and then as Zimmerman was walking back to his truck Trayvon Martin attacked him.

 

There was no pursuit. There was no racial profiling. 

Aussie54 3586 pts

 uniteusnow  Terry Mann and one more thing on this subject, Trayvon Martin was armed. It is called his fists. 

BertDilbert 2211 pts

 uniteusnow  Terry Mann Funny.

 

This comment has been deleted
rrrrottenapples 6782 pts

 snapsbacula  uniteusnow i would bet good money, those backing treyvon because he is BLACK, are the same ones who voted obama in because they THOUGHT he was black, he is close to 80% arab, but looks black, that should tell you the mentality of about 99% of those backing treyvon

 

they put up meaningless links to justify their racism, that have NO similarities to this case, absolutely NONE

 

when it comes down to it, those folks dont care if blacks kill blacks, why?

because it is a black doing the killing, "one of their own"

 

as opposed to ANY non-black defending themselves, as is the obvious case of zimmerman

 

they bring up a crazy assed neo nazi, and a black guy that shot someone in cold blooded murder because in reality, said black guy was mad about some construction work,lol

 

and thats the best they can do, ignorance, seriously

Aussie54 3586 pts

 rrrrottenapples  snapsbacula  uniteusnow what I do not get is why they refuse to face the fact that Zimmerman is more black than the current POTUS

eclecticsandra 1325 pts

 Aussie54  rrrrottenapples  snapsbacula  uniteusnow Aussie, "Zimmerman is more black than the current POTUS" ???? How can you say that? Obama's father was black from Africa.  Zimmerman's parents are white. Did you miss the lesson on fractions?

FredrickMassey 47 pts

 eclecticsandra George Zimmerman''s lineage is negro-Peruvian.

 

Obama's momma was whiter than a KKK bedsheet.

 

Math handicapped AND colorblind as well.  You do have issues.

FredrickMassey 47 pts

 uniteusnow Nazi democrat Sheriff Candidate......DEMOCRAT

patti is ticked 7904 pts

 FredrickMassey Well, I'M not being played... and not stupid enough to fall for the media's bullshit. Z is a local dude who would no longer be alive, if TM had his way.  TM failed to understand that not all supposed "white folks" are tourists like the ones who mistakenly wandered into his hood in Miami gardens.  Tourists are usually unarmed. Most fly here, and you know it is damn near impossible not to get arrested for transporting a firearm, even when you follow the law while doing it.

 

Sharpton and his Clown Posse have brought a situation here that may very well end up costing many lives.

Previous post:

Next post: