Why you should support the teachers in the Chicago strike, even if you think they’re wrong:

by Joshua Vogel on September 11, 2012

in Editorial,Society

If you don’t support the teachers striking in Chicago, go pick up a history book, and flip to the pages about the working conditions at the US at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. Here are the highlights: child labor, company scrip, insane working hours, unconscionably low wages, and unsafe working conditions. What’s that got to do with teachers striking today?  Everything.

This country desperately needs a new labor movement. In the battle of employers versus employees, employees have been getting trounced for more than 20 years. Between crippling debt, high unemployment, wide-spread underemployment, outsourcing, education costs and low wages, the middle class is in danger of extinction. The only cure is for workers to unite and forge a new deal with employers- a deal where wealth generated by the working class isn’t sent oversees, or stuffed into the pockets of the already insanely rich.

Do you ever wonder why most jobs give you weekends off; or why the 40-hour work week was the norm (until recently); or why your office building has safety precautions like fire escapes, railings where they’re needed, and sprinklers overhead? Do you ever wonder why there is a legal limit to how low an hourly wage can be? Do you ever wonder why children aren’t in the workforce in the US?

Did you assume that our modern and (relatively) humane working conditions were just something that spontaneously evolved as the US grew up?

Well, it didn’t happen that way.  Not at all.

All these things that we take for granted had to be fought for- and it was no short skirmish.  It took decades and the efforts of several generations of workers to turn an exploitative economic machine into a system where workers could share in the benefits of their labor, and where they didn’t have to choose between spending time with their children or feeding them.

And how exactly did the working class achieve all this?  Organized labor.  Unions.

One worker has no power against an employer.  Workers are replaceable and interchangeable.  It’s only when workers band together that they have any influence at all.  This is all as true today as it was a hundred years ago.

It was only when workers stood together and said, ‘Treat us fairly, or we’re shutting the whole system down,’  that employers stopped behaving barbarically, and that the government was forced to enact worker protections.

…but time passed, and the people who remembered what the world was like before unions have all died off.  And all that remain are the people who remember the end of the union era- when the unions were bloated and sometimes too powerful, and sometimes corrupt.

Corporate power grew, and grew, and launched relentless campaigns to crush unions.  With their biggest battles won, all attention was on the unions’ short-comings, and the problems they caused.   Two generations of happy, healthy workers let the unions die a slow and quiet death.

The anti-union mentality of corporations is as strong as ever.  Just google ‘walmart and unions’ for a perfect example of the tactics that corporate America are using today.  If what you read there doesn’t scare you, then keep reading.

That corporations are anti-union isn’t surprising.  That’s the way it’s always been.  What’s surprising is how much of the middle class (an economic class that wouldn’t even exist today without unions) is anti-union.

In the meantime, the 40-hour work week is fading away, replaced by the “silicon valley work ethic” which is the principle that if you are at home eating dinner with your family, you obviously don’t care about your job.  And even with longer hours, record high rates of worker productivity, and astounding corporate profit margins, our wages have pretty much stagnated over the past two decades.

You see, what people didn’t realize about unions was this:  The job of the unions is never done.  As long as corporations exist, they will be motivated to lower their labor costs, while maximizing their labor output.  This means that there will be constant pressure to erode workers rights and to lower wages.  To counteract this unceasing trend, we need a force pushing in the opposite direction.  The only force that can do that is organized labor.

The sad thing is that even as the need for worker protections is becoming obvious, Americans are turning to the government to help them, while happily vilifying unions. Had they any sense of history, Americans would realize that the government doesn’t protect labor unless labor movements can apply enough political force to outweigh corporate influence.

In 2005 during the New York City transit strike, New York’s BILLIONAIRE mayor accused the transit workers of being greedy for wanting a fair wage for working exhausting and dangerous jobs in one of the most expensive cities on the planet.  41% of New Yorkers thought that the union workers were responsible for the strike.

I was in New York during that strike, and among those who opposed the transit workers, the reasoning most commonly given was something like this: ‘The transit workers are greedy because *I* don’t make that much, and my job is harder.’  You see, when people calculate what wage they consider to be fair, they are comparing that wage to wages of other people in the community.

But what happens when EVERYONE’S wages are artificially low?  Is that not the case now, with 2 decades of increased economic growth, and 2 decades of essentially stagnant wages?  Everyone knows that workers are getting a smaller piece of a bigger pie that they helped to bake.  Few people in New York actually stopped to wonder if maybe a fair wage has nothing to do with an average wage.  This is what labor unions are good for- they can say to employers, ‘It doesn’t matter that everyone else in town is underpaid. We know our worth, and want our fair share.’

Unions are the only force in the US that can push back against exploitation of the working class, but right now they have only a fraction of the power and influence they once wielded.  THIS is the reason you should be supporting the Teachers Union in Chicago, and every other union brave enough to strike.  We should be supporting labor unions wherever and however we can.  Because we need them to be strong.  We need them to grow, and to multiply, and to rise up against relentless onslaught which threatens our quality of life, and our children’s future.

We need the Chicago Teachers Union to win their contract battle, and win the war for public support- not for the good of the teachers, the school system, or the children, but for the good of workers everywhere.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
patti is ticked 7904 pts

GZLEGALCASE.COM. READ IT AND WEEP, HOODIES. TAKE A GANDER AT Z'S FACE IN THAT PHOTO. YOU KNOW, THE ONE COREY AND THOSE FRAUD PREACHERS AND RACIST SHITS FROM THE NBPP IGNORED. THE MARTINS IGNORED, OR TRIED TO JUSTIFY. READ THE DEPOSITIONS.

tifosies 165 pts

Thank you Josh~ nice analysis! The well-funded attack on the teacher's union, which is perpetuated in conservative media, is a disservice not only to teachers, but to the children crammed into over-crowded classrooms.  

wesley koelewijn 11 pts

I agree that they are on strike. I think that teachers are underrated all over the world. They get a horrible salary and they have a very important job.

My latest conversation: luchtreiniger

BertDilbert 2211 pts

This is the biggest piece of trash ever written on this site.  While there are multiple issues I will address only one.

 

You propose that there should be a golden class of worker, the government worker who has wages and benefits well above comparable private sector jobs.  And why should regular people be taxed to support this upper class government worker?

 

We achieved our living standard by killing people.  We bombed the shit out of Europe and Japan.   This created a manufacturing monopoly.  Unless you are willing to do a repeat performance, our living standard will drop to pre WWII levels.  

 

Your suggestion that the private sector is not paid enough does not justify that they should outsource their incomes to pay for overpaid government workers.     

Paul Hue 3470 pts

These teachers are appalling. They are destroying what should be a profession. Professions don't have unions, or when they do, they demean and devalue themselves. Teachers no longer even have authentic academic credentials, just degrees in "teaching", whatever that means. The results speak for themselves. They get paid more than those of us in real, authentic professions, withe real, authentic academic credentials. They have no performance reviews, jaw dropping retirement and medical benefits, set workday hours as if they were assembly line workers, and even then it is less than 40 hrs, then those months of vacations.

Rowwdy 8669 pts

Josh:   With respect to the Chicago's Teacher's Union, I have to disagree you.   Actually I disagree with any union as they are today.

 

At one point, unions served a purpose.  However, they have become so corrupt and so heavy handed, they serve only themselves.   Union bosses do not care about the members.   They care about becoming rich off the backs of hard working people.   Trumpka ring a bell.

 

Here is a list of some of the top union bosses....

 

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka – $293,750.

 

National Education Association President Dennis Van Roekel – $460,060

 

Service Employees International Union President Mary Kay Henry – $290,334.

 

American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees President Gerald McEntee – $512,489.

 

International Brotherhood of Teamsters President James P. Hoffa , Jr. – $372,489.

 

American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten – $493,859.

 

International Association of Fire Fighters President Harold Schaitberger – $323,811.

 

American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees President Gerald McEntee – $512,489. 

 

National Education Association President Dennis Van Roekel – $460,060

 

United Food and Commercial Workers President Joseph Hansen – $361,124

 

I seriously doubt the above identify with the peon workers.   Unions go beyond the idiots in the Chicago School District.   Look at how the union members used children in their strike in WI.   Shameful.  Look at how they lied about taking a sick day with phony doctor's notes..   They even trashed the Capitol Bldg.   Ultimately....they lost.

 

They have  destroyed  much of our industry with their high demands.   They have harmed our economy.  They have harmed coal miners, steel workers,  construction companies and a bevy of other  industries because of their greed.  

 

In addition to the unbridled greed of men like Trumpka and the rest, they have become bullies.   If union members won't go along with the union dictates, they are literally threatened and/or beat up.  Unions even tell their members who to vote for.   SEIU comes to mind in NV.  Harry Reid would not have been reelected had it not been for the blatant dishonesty and fraud of SEIU.  

 

Having lived in Chicago for over 2 decades, I can tell you 100%...the teachers are terrible for the most part.  They are lazy and they are consummate whiners.    The majority of teachers are between $60, 000 and $80,000 pay per year.  Yet they only work between 186 and 190 days TOTAL.   Where else can you get paid that kind of money, insurance and pension plans for PART TIME work?  

 

No one forces people to become teachers.   No one forces them to stay.   I have no sympathy for these people.  I've seen them in action and they are a disgrace to education.

 

Bottom line....people are tired of union and the union's manipulations.

 

 

 

 

 

patti is ticked 7904 pts

 

 Rowwdy 

Beautifully said, Rowwdy!

Rowwdy 8669 pts

 patti is ticked   Thank you patti.  :)

JoshuaVogel 9 pts

 Rowwdy Thank you for that thorough rebuttal.

 

I don't dispute that there is corruption in unions- as there is corruption in all large institutions.  What I'm trying to say is that regardless of their problems, we need unions to be stronger, larger, more prevalent, and more influential. 

 

Also, those salary figures you put next to those union bosses are, for the most part, well in line with the work that they do. 

 

For every price tag you put next to a rich union boss, I could find a corporate CEO with comparable duties making LITERALLY 100 times more- and it's those people who are truly out of touch with the American worker, and those people who are controlling our political system.

 

As for union bosses being out-of-touch with the "peon" workers?  No.  Though SOME union bosses may be more interested in their own careers, they all got where they are by spending years championing those folks.

 

A word on some of your other points:

 

Union members using their children to gain public sympathy IS not an unfair tactic.  The lives of those children are directly affected by their parents' wages and working conditions.  Besides, from the moment a strike starts, it becomes battle of public persuasion.  Corporate interests own and control ALL the network and cable television, and have the ear of State and Federal officials.   All the workers have left is their own voices, and the story they can tell.

 

Regarding unions "destroying our economy with their high demands".   What actually destroyed certain sectors of the economy was the fact that the US opened up free trade with other nations WITHOUT worker protections as a precondition.  Of course a third-world sweatshop can offer lower prices than an American factory with all it's safety conditions and fair wages.  But it isn't fair to blame the unions just because our government decided that cheap goods were more important than human rights for foreign workers.

 

Regarding Union bullies:  Yeah, those exist.  Unions aren't perfect- that's not my argument.  My argument is that as flawed as they are, we need them to be strong enough to beat down the corporations that own our government.  And it should be noted that corporate anti-union bullies are out there too.

 

Regarding your anti-teacher paragraph:  You're hanging onto the fallacy of comparing the average wage with a fair wage.  $60,000 -  $80,000 isn't a lot of money, especially considering the huge expense of obtaining an Bachelors and Masters degree, which most teachers are required to get.   To put things in perspective:  if American workers were getting the same percentage of profits that they did in the '50s, the average American wage would be $100,000.   So don't let the fact that we're all underpaid skew your sense of what's fair for teachers.   We should all be making a lot more money.  Because they have a union, teachers are living closer to where we all would be if not for corporate greed.

 

Bottom line:  The enemy of the working class people are large corporations.  Whatever corruption or other problems you see in unions, those concerns should be DWARFED by comparison.  Because it really is a choice between stronger unions or unchecked corporate control.

 

 

 

 

Rowwdy 8669 pts

 JoshuaVogel  Thanks for the respone Josh.  We had all begun to think you disappeared from planet Wagist.

 

"Union members using their children to gain public sympathy IS not an unfair tactic."

 

Problem was Josh....most of the kids present were not the children of the teachers.  They were students and many of whom didn't have parental permission.    Putting kids who really don't have a clue into confrontational strikes is ..IMO,  using these kids for appearance's sake. 

 

"we need unions to be stronger, larger, more prevalent, and more influential."

 

Therein lies the problem.  As the unions became more powerful, they became more corrupt.   They pander to politicians just like corporations do.   Look at Trumpka.  He is the classic example of a crook.  He made sure he got Obamo to appoint him to a high position so he could go after the NLRB.    SEIU is another union that engaged in bullying in the last national election.   That is not part of helping people get fair treatment in a corporate setting. 

 

I agree corporations need to have someone acting as a watchdog so we don't return to days of old.  However, the unions of today are not the way.   Closed shops force people into something they neither want nor believe in.  

 

Just my opinion, but I do not believe in public servants belonging to unions.  Be it teachers, cops, firemen, EMTs, etc.   The idea these people can strike causes great vulnerability to the public.   That is morally wrong. 

 

I  realize people pay for college, but doesn't everyone...even non-union people who want a better job by getting a college degree.    I paid for my college myself..  As did my wife.  I do not begrudge paying for ANY of my college including Loyola, which I can tell you, was NOT cheap  for the Masters program.  I have not ever thought that I should some how be compensated with a higher wage because I possess a couple of degrees I CHOSE to study for.

 

Are you aware Josh;  there is a teacher in the CPS that 'demanded' time off to make her pilgrimage to Mecca?  She is young (had a lifetime to make that trip) and only been in the district 3 yrs.  Didn't even have enough time accrued for the time off.   Her request was totally out of line, but the union backed her.  

 

Ultimately, she quit, sued and received $75,000.  I as a Catholic would NEVER have been givent the same consideration had I asked for time off to travel to the Vatican for a special holy day.   This is has become another problem where unions are present.

 

Fy;\i:  While I may be a conservative, I am sick of both sides of the aisle.  We need to fire all the politicians and start over. 

 

 

Paul Hue 3470 pts

 JoshuaVogel  Rowwdy Josh: Rowwdy is not "anti-teacher". He is anti-uneducated, lazy, poor-performing worker of any sort, including teacher. And although teachers are required to have a bachelors and masters degree, degrees in "education" are intellectually worthless, and one reason that teacher performance is so low.

BertDilbert 2211 pts

 Paul Hue  JoshuaVogel  Rowwdy 

Not all teachers need massive higher education.   Consider that each teacher has just completed grades K through 12  and thus has at least 12 years of classroom exp.   Figuring out the other side should not be all that difficult.  To "improve" education along came the requirement of masters degrees etc to show standards but they can't find the number of teachers they need so they fill with people with "emergency credentials"" which means shit.  Unions have done nothing to further kids educations, only to line their pockets.      

tifosies 165 pts

 Paul Hue  LOL! Spoken like a person who didn't achieve higher education.  Just look at the employment numbers~post-graduate degrees increase likelihood of employment.  JoshuaVogel  Rowwdy 

Previous post: